Recommended Posts
bozo 0
Anybody but you . :o)
bozo
bozo
Pain is fleeting. Glory lasts forever. Chicks dig scars.
bozo
bozo
Pain is fleeting. Glory lasts forever. Chicks dig scars.
QuoteIt was also back in the day that women weren't really supposed to *enjoy* sex... it was what we did to please our men.
Please explain this "Back in the day" reference. I'm confused.

It was also back in the day that women weren't really supposed to *enjoy* sex... it was what we did to please our men. And, that standard of purity was really only applied to women. If a woman didn't bleed on her marriage bed she was considered impure (never mind that the hymen can break through all kinds of ways other than intercourse...). Men, on the other hand, could sow their wild oats, and in fact were expected to.
I'm sure some of it comes from the whole male ego thing. Some of it comes from a lingering idea that a woman who has been with other men is somehow "unclean." If she's been with other men and (horrors!) enjoyed it, then she's clearly a slut. Men who think this way want to have their cake and eat it too: "I want a woman who enjoys sex and is sexually adventurous, but has only ever done that with ME."
A guy who thinks like that also makes me wonder ... does he idealize women? In other words, does he have them up on this pedastal and have this expectation of "what a woman is" that, really, no *real* woman will be able to meet (at least not without trying desperately to bend herself into some idealized version of "woman" that her man has created in his own head.)
Why *should* the standard be different? The fact that you've made the point to phrase the question this way indicates that it would be different, however. Which smacks of the whole "fuck the slut but marry the virgin" standard that has been applied to women for years and years. Implying, somehow, that the former is not "worthy" of marriage but somehow the latter is. Sadly, there's a lot of people who still apply that standard today.
As a woman, I may have different standards for someone I'd have a fling with vs. somebody I'd get into a long-term relationship with, but those standards are not at all related to his sexual experience. It usually has to do with overall compatibility ... there might be great sexual energy there but for whatever reason we don't make sense in a relationship.
That brings up another standard that is often applied to women ... "It's okay if she's had long-term relationships, but no way do I want to be with a woman who has had flings or one-night stands. Unless it's for a one-night stand, in which case, bring it on!" Sigh.
Not everyone who loves sex is a screamer.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites