CriticalLF 0 #1 November 9, 2006 I have been studying peoples signature blocks recently as they are a good expression of a persons psychie and personality and was wondering with under two months to go what will replace Ron's tag of New for 2006, Smileys with every post!!!!! I thought that it could be a write in competition, what do you think Ron? If you don't want to I'm quite happy to have a competition to replace mine. Answers on a postcardThe CLF On break off turn and track as far and as fast as possible.... Because not only your life depends on it but so does mine!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewGuy2005 53 #2 November 9, 2006 New for 2007, Smileys with every post!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CriticalLF 0 #3 November 9, 2006 I take my hat off to the unmatched genius, that was so obvious I didn't think of it. (I ignore the subtle flaw that it is not really new in 2007 as it was new in 2006 but then that might open up a metaphysical of philosiphical depate about what is new) Any other thoughts out thereThe CLF On break off turn and track as far and as fast as possible.... Because not only your life depends on it but so does mine!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2fat2fly 0 #4 November 9, 2006 Smileys II The Sequel You've All Been Waiting ForI am not the man. But the man knows my name...and he's worried Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron 10 #5 November 10, 2006 QuoteI have been studying peoples signature blocks recently as they are a good expression of a persons psychie and personality and was wondering with under two months to go what will replace Ron's tag I'll make you a deal. Tell me what you got from my sig line, and we can run a contest. There will have to be some rules, but I'm game. QuoteSmileys II The Sequel You've All Been Waiting For Really funny! I can hear the announcer guy's voice when I read it."No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites