ryoder 1,590 #26 June 21, 2007 Quote I'm voting this for the most boring thread ever. Buncha Geeks. I'm sure I speak for all of us when I say we would have no objections if you would like to post your own "NaughtyWife" pics in here."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eeneR 3 #27 June 21, 2007 Quote I'm voting this for the most boring thread ever. Buncha Geeks. PTTHHBB She is not a "Dumb Blonde" - She is a "Light-Haired Detour Off The Information Superhighway." eeneR TF#72, FB#4130, Incauto Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Icon134 0 #28 June 21, 2007 Quote I'm voting this for the most boring thread ever. Buncha Geeks. I agree this thread is useless without boobies... Livin' on the Edge... sleeping with my rigger's wife... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymama 37 #29 June 21, 2007 Actually, I'm just envious that you guys can figure all this stuff out. It's been endlessly frustrating for me to try to get a laptop connected to the internet at home. I fixed it by just giving up. She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man, because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eeneR 3 #30 June 21, 2007 Quote Quote I'm voting this for the most boring thread ever. Buncha Geeks. I agree this thread is useless without boobies... There is a geek with boobies...that should count for something Course I wont post them though She is not a "Dumb Blonde" - She is a "Light-Haired Detour Off The Information Superhighway." eeneR TF#72, FB#4130, Incauto Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Icon134 0 #31 June 21, 2007 Quote Quote Quote I'm voting this for the most boring thread ever. Buncha Geeks. I agree this thread is useless without boobies... There is a geek with boobies...that should count for something Course I wont post them though Um... I was thinking of the other kind of boobies... Like this pair right here...Livin' on the Edge... sleeping with my rigger's wife... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #32 June 21, 2007 Quote Quote I'm voting this for the most boring thread ever. Buncha Geeks. I agree this thread is useless without boobies... OK, in keeping with the geek theme, and complying with your wishes: http://perso.enstimac.fr/~alaouimd/linux_girls_007.jpg NSFW"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eeneR 3 #33 June 21, 2007 Quote Um... I was thinking of the other kind of boobies... TongueLaughLaugh Like this pair right here... Right...sure Scott She is not a "Dumb Blonde" - She is a "Light-Haired Detour Off The Information Superhighway." eeneR TF#72, FB#4130, Incauto Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Icon134 0 #34 June 21, 2007 Quote Quote Um... I was thinking of the other kind of boobies... TongueLaughLaugh Like this pair right here... Right...sure Scott I'm at work... I can't look at the other kind... Livin' on the Edge... sleeping with my rigger's wife... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
okalb 104 #35 June 21, 2007 Quote yes...ess possible... DSL Are you home this weekend?Time flies like an arrow....fruit flies like a banana Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #36 June 21, 2007 Quote Quote Quote yeah - but are they "dishwasher safe?" I think not! I thought this was going to be about power tools! argh, argh, argh, aaaarrrrrrggghhhhh.......... Chuck I was in a bookstore at a mall once, and on the shelf with all the other home-handyman books was a copy of "Unix Power Tools". http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/upt2/ _____________________________________ That there's funny... I don't care who you are! This has nothing to do with the topic at hand but... One time, I took my older uncle to a big sporting goods store. One of the clerks wanted him to leave for farting. I explained that my old uncle was just checking-out the duck calls! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #37 June 21, 2007 I'll be at the dz! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #38 June 21, 2007 it's at least seeing more action than you Pot thread....although it does resemble a networking forum or user group...I am NOT a geek! I keep telling you that! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymama 37 #39 June 21, 2007 Quote I am NOT a geek! I keep telling you that! Just because you say it, doesn't make it true. She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man, because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #40 June 21, 2007 You're interrupting my perusing of the Unix chicks...and my attempt at understanding the differences between the Cisco world and the Alcatel world as it regards to access port and trunk ports versus frame tagging. stupid French... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymama 37 #41 June 21, 2007 Like you've never hijacked a thread before! Fine, I'll take my toys and leave now. She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man, because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #42 June 21, 2007 Quote You're interrupting my perusing of the Unix chicks...and my attempt at understanding the differences between the Cisco world and the Alcatel world as it regards to access port and trunk ports versus frame tagging. stupid French... VLAN Tagging: Making a single physical link act like multiple links. Link Aggregation: Making multiple physical links act like a single link. Trunking: A telco term referring to time division multiplexing, hijacked by idiots in the datacom world where it means absolutely nothing because some vendors use it to mean VLAN-tagging, and some use it to mean link aggregation."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #43 June 21, 2007 which is exactly why it leads to confusion with Cisco, Alcatel, and Nortel all in the same enterprise... trunk port with default VLAN? secondary VLAN for the pc drop? switch port with tagging? data port tagging on VoIP set???? not even worried about aggregation now....and that's ether channel to Cisco...can't we all just go by the standards??? no! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #44 June 21, 2007 Quote which is exactly why it leads to confusion with Cisco, Alcatel, and Nortel all in the same enterprise... trunk port with default VLAN? secondary VLAN for the pc drop? switch port with tagging? data port tagging on VoIP set???? not even worried about aggregation now....and that's ether channel to Cisco...can't we all just go by the standards??? no! And Foundry uses the opposite terminology from Cisco. There is no excuse for using the term "trunking" in datacom when you don't mean TDM. Then there was a few weeks back when I was digging and digging through Cisco doc trying w/o to find info on configuring SSL VPN. Finally figured out the idiots referred to it as "WebVPN"."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #45 June 21, 2007 add to that the confusion based on the Cisco device you're configuring SSL VPN on! router? pix? asa????? no wonder people are starting to look at non-Cisco solutions...'specially when you add in the cost and the support traps that Cisco adds to the life of their technology. Haven't played with Foundry gear...yet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
okalb 104 #46 June 21, 2007 Quote I'll be at the dz! Good then I can draw out what I need and see if it makes any sense.Time flies like an arrow....fruit flies like a banana Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #47 June 21, 2007 Quote add to that the confusion based on the Cisco device you're configuring SSL VPN on! router? pix? asa????? no wonder people are starting to look at non-Cisco solutions...'specially when you add in the cost and the support traps that Cisco adds to the life of their technology. Haven't played with Foundry gear...yet. (ASA) Here is something I discovered by accident that even surprised our Cisco reps: The PIX 7.x image and the ASA 7.x image are the same file! Foundry is a great company to work with, but the reliability of the h/w isn't nearly as good as Cisco. We use them for load-balancing, but not for access switches or routers. For fw's we prefer Juniper/Netscreen, but troubleshooting on a Netscreen gives me a headache. Of the three, I give Netscreen top marks for s/w reliability."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 867 #48 June 21, 2007 doesn't surprise me with Cisco!!! Juniper/Netscreen are effin fast too...and I agree on troubleshooting and the policies are hard for me to understand sometimes... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
