0
CSpenceFLY

How would DZ.com change if you had to be sponsored to get on the forum?

Recommended Posts

I was looking at another forum the other day and you had to have two sponsors before you could read or post on the forums. Your sponsors could also withdraw their sponsorship at anytime. I'm not sure what happened if your sponsor lost their sponsor.

How do you think this would effect DZ.com if a system like that was put into place?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I was looking at another forum the other day and you had to have two sponsors before you could read or post on the forums. Your sponsors could also withdraw their sponsorship at anytime. I'm not sure what happened if your sponsor lost their sponsor.

How do you think this would effect DZ.com if a system like that was put into place?



1) All the idiots currently posting here could could still invite all their idiot buddies onto the forum.

2) Genuine newbies or people from small DZs with no current posters would be excluded from a vast wealth of information through no fault of their own.

3) It would just suck.
Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what jakee said.
There would be teams of assholes who disagree with each other sponsoring friends who would side with them. one side would be squeak the other would be Cocheese.

which side would you be on?


Me? I'd be on the right side:D

EDIT: More like the outside

My photos

My Videos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I only have two fans and one of them is an exhaust fan



Just so ya know...that guy staring at you when you look in the mirror doesn't count as being your fan...:D

___________________________________________
meow

I get a Mike hug! I get a Mike hug!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would suck.. Plain and simple.

The biggest problem I see here is that so few do the majority of the posting (Yes, I am part of that problem). There are too few new people coming in as it is. To change to even more of an elitist foundation would make it worse.

I would rather find a way to bring new people out of lurk mode and into contributing than look for ways to exclude people.

This site is alt like a virtual DZ, There are people I like, People that I have no opinion on and people that I dont like. Just like everywhere else. Even if people had to "Sponsored" I dont think that would change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

There are people I like, People that I have no opinion on and people that I dont like. Just like everywhere else. Even if people had to "Sponsored" I dont think that would change.



Except you would replace the word "person" with "Team" or "clique"...or maybe "assholes" lol
My photos

My Videos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not saying this is a good system. I was looking at this more from the angle of if it would change peoples behavior if they knew people had to like them for them to be here.

For the record with my current attitude I might be a little worried about this system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm not saying this is a good system. I was looking at this more from the angle of if it would change peoples behavior if they knew people had to like them for them to be here.

For the record with my current attitude I might be a little worried about this system.



Although it is true that you and I do not always (or even often, and most probably, never) see eye-to-eye, I would sponsor you simply because it is most often vehement disagreement that gives birth to personal growth and new ideas.

Moderation--of any kind--sucks for a whole host of reasons, and the requirement that someone be liked enough to gain sponsorship in order to have his or her voice heard absolutely, positively, unequivocally SUCKS.

Web forums are a terrible blow to free speech and the free exchange of ideas anyway, but sponsorship is ridiculous.

rl
If you don't know where you're going, you should know where you came from. Gullah Proverb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I was looking at another forum the other day and you had to have two sponsors before you could read or post on the forums. Your sponsors could also withdraw their sponsorship at anytime. I'm not sure what happened if your sponsor lost their sponsor.

How do you think this would effect DZ.com if a system like that was put into place?



A lot of people would be asking *me* to sponsor them.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Moderation--of any kind--sucks for a whole host of reasons, and the requirement that someone be liked enough to gain sponsorship in order to have his or her voice heard absolutely, positively, unequivocally SUCKS.

Web forums are a terrible blow to free speech and the free exchange of ideas anyway, but sponsorship is ridiculous.

rl



You have *got* to be kidding or just pot stirring here. You were there on rec.skydiving and saw how lack of moderation drove loads of people away. I'm a believer in free thought and communication but think it's a real stretch to say that moderation is somehow a blow to free speech. It doesn't take away anyone's freedom of *public* speech.

If I say something offensive to you (and I can't even imagine what that would be) in your house then you can tell me to get the fuck out. Moderated web forums are no different. They are not really a public space.

That being said, I'm no big fan of closed societies--and requiring sponsors *is* pretty much the definition of a closed society--if that's what the society wants, then I don't see a problem. The BASE jumping community was like that for years and in some areas I'm sure it still is.

Walt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Web forums are a terrible blow to free speech and the free exchange of ideas anyway, but sponsorship is ridiculous.



Why do you think this?



Because I know that a lot of important, relevant words are uttered by people I can't stand, just as a lot of inane nonsense is put forth by people I like a whole lot. (And I have some of both to my own credit, just like everyone else.)

Usenet allows people to use killfiles--it then becomes an individual decision to turn a deaf ear to someone's words. Web forums resort to net nannies--people who are adjudged by the site owner to have "superior judgment" about what is appropriate and not (i.e., what falls within the forum guidelines). I haven't seen it happen anywhere that moderators are possessed of such traits as to enable them to put aside their personal likes and prejudices to be utterly fair in making judgments. The legal system understands the impossibility, and it maintains a system of checks and balances, but on a web forum, it comes down to the site owner saying "this is my property, and I can do what I want."

Okay, fine. But that doesn't make it right and it doesn't make it fair. (The great trait of usenet is that even though individuals (just like a web forum owner, but bigger) own all those nntp servers that send the posts ever onward, you'll never catch any of them (except, of course, Microsoft, which is nothing but a big bully in every aspect of its existence) censoring the posts that go through them, except as to floods and spam.

Sponsorship takes the moderation problem one step further--people are required to suck up in unnatural ways so that their voices may be heard.

I do believe there are a lot of words spoken that should never be said and that those words reflect the bad character of their speaker, but I would never want to be the one to silence the voice of another*. That doesn't mean I have to listen, but there's a big difference between my refusing to read a post and someone else making the unilateral decision that no one else will read a post.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

I'm not sure I'm explaining this very well. I'm tired. If I reread it tomorrow, and it doesn't make sense to me, I'll try to fix it.

(*I would never/have never hesitated to pound on someone who voiced a pig-ignorant opinon--and I've taken a few poundings of my own when I've said/written something moronic--but that's not the same thing as killing someone's post so that no one has a chance to weigh in with their evaluation of the quality of the thought. People don't learn anything from going to the Recycle Bin. They do learn when everyone else jumps all over them and makes them think about the stupid words they've written. In a forum where remaining requires avoiding giving offense, no one learns anything.)
If you don't know where you're going, you should know where you came from. Gullah Proverb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'd have my masters if I was able to be rejected by this site.



That would be two of us!

Moderation is like picking a lock, if you do it right no one knows you have done anything at all...
Yesterday is history
And tomorrow is a mystery

Parachutemanuals.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0