normiss 858 #1 January 15, 2008 Consumers: All persons located in the United States who purchased any diamond or diamond jewelry or other products containing gem diamonds for personal use and not for resale between January 1, 1994 and March 31, 2006. For example, Consumers include people who purchased diamond jewelry to wear or to give as a gift. Full Information Here: Lawsuit Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymama 37 #2 January 15, 2008 No, but you are more than welcome to buy me diamonds any time you like. She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man, because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 858 #3 January 15, 2008 weren't you a recent recipient of diamonds??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymama 37 #4 January 15, 2008 Quote weren't you a recent recipient of diamonds??? Yes. So what's your point? She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man, because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kaerodyne 0 #5 January 15, 2008 Quote Quote weren't you a recent recipient of diamonds??? Yes. So what's your point? SHINNY THINGS Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bolas 5 #6 January 15, 2008 Quote Quote weren't you a recent recipient of diamonds??? Yes. So what's your point? When did you move to Utah? Stupidity if left untreated is self-correcting If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymama 37 #7 January 15, 2008 Quote When did you move to Utah? It wouldn't have to be a ring, I like earrings, necklaces and bracelets too. But no ankle bracelet...EW. She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man, because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lauraliscious 0 #8 January 15, 2008 Quote Quote weren't you a recent recipient of diamonds??? Yes. So what's your point? You could get some $$ back as part of this lawsuit settlement. Enemiga Rodriguez, PMS #369, OrFun #25, Team Dirty Sanchez #116, Pelt Head #29, Muff #4091 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skymama 37 #9 January 15, 2008 Quote You could get some $$ back as part of this lawsuit settlement. It ends in 2006. My ring doesn't qualify. She is Da Man, and you better not mess with Da Man, because she will lay some keepdown on you faster than, well, really fast. ~Billvon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lauraliscious 0 #10 January 15, 2008 Quote Quote You could get some $$ back as part of this lawsuit settlement. It ends in 2006. My ring doesn't qualify. Enemiga Rodriguez, PMS #369, OrFun #25, Team Dirty Sanchez #116, Pelt Head #29, Muff #4091 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bolas 5 #11 January 15, 2008 Quote Quote When did you move to Utah? It wouldn't have to be a ring, I like earrings, necklaces and bracelets too. But no ankle bracelet...EW. So diamond inlaid nipple rings are okay? Stupidity if left untreated is self-correcting If ya can't be good, look good, if that fails, make 'em laugh. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #12 January 15, 2008 What a "settlement." $250M to DeBeers isn't shit.Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 858 #13 January 15, 2008 even more so when you factor in the average fees to attorneys in class action settlements... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #14 January 15, 2008 Quote even more so when you factor in the average fees to attorneys in class action settlements... It's usually a straight 30%...Not a lot...Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 858 #15 January 15, 2008 30% of $250 million isn't a lot you you??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #16 January 15, 2008 Quote30% of $250 million isn't a lot you you??? Divided between how many attorneys, less taxes, divided by the number of hours worked....?Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACMESkydiver 0 #17 January 15, 2008 I looked at the claim form, but I didn't see exactly how I'm supposed to prove what we paid...I mean crap, after 13 years we don't exactly still have the sales receipts. ~Jaye Do not believe that possibly you can escape the reward of your action. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrophyHusband 0 #18 January 15, 2008 i can't believe i just found the receipt for my wife's engagement ring plus the receipt for a necklace with 3 diamonds i bought her. i'm sure the number of people that fall into the class action number well into the millions, but i wonder how many people still have receipts to prove what they paid. maybe i'll get in on this. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
