0
JohnnyZ

Micron Canopy Sizing Question...

Recommended Posts

I'm looking to order a new Micron for next season.
I'll be jumping a Velocity 111 with 750 lines for at least he first year. Does anybody out there know if I can stuff that canopy into a V316 (or V306) with a PD 113 Reserve? Would switching to the 500 lines make much difference?
I'd like to keep this container for several years, and I'm sure that I'll eventually end up on a Velocity 103 or similar canopy.
Any input will be appreciated.

JZ ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I'm looking to order a new Micron for next season.
I'll be jumping a Velocity 111 with 750 lines for at least he first year. Does anybody out there know if I can stuff that canopy into a V316 (or V306) with a PD 113 Reserve? Would switching to the 500 lines make much difference?
I'd like to keep this container for several years, and I'm sure that I'll eventually end up on a Velocity 103 or similar canopy.
Any input will be appreciated.

JZ ;)



It depends on who you ask.

According to this article from PD's website, a Velocity 111 packs like a Stiletto one size larger, in your case, like a Stiletto 120. A Stiletto 120 is an optimum canopy size for both the V306 and V316.

According to RWS the largest that fits well in a V306 or V316 is a 103. I did notice RWS does not really offer a range of canopies that will fit, although one might reasonably expect a little bit of tolerance up and down. However, it is generally accepted that the container manufacturer's instructions take precedent over the canopy manufacturer's instruction, should they conflict.

RWS does not actually advertise a container for that canopy combination. They recommend a Velocity be packed into a V319, but with a PR-126, not a PR-113. Again, they don't advertise a range, but an optimum size.
You are currently loading a 143 at almost 1.6:1 (according to your profile), which is already high for a reserve, even one built by PD. Increasing that loading to 2:1 by downsizing to a 113 seems a bit aggressive, especially for someone with so few jumps. (Yeah, I said it! ;) 900 jumps isn't that many.) A V319 is very similar in dimensions to the V306 and V316, and would allow you to jump a 126 at "only" 1.8:1. Unfortunately, RWS does not build containers suitable for both highly loaded mains, and safely loaded reserves.

Regarding the line size, since it will likely be a tight fit if you squeeze the 111 in either the V306 or the V316, the smaller lines may make packing slightly easier. They shouldn't make much difference in a V319.

chris@tso-d.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0