0
leroydb

Skydiver in the wire... Question pertaining to BASE...

Recommended Posts

I preface this by saying that I do not want to upset or ruffle anyones feathers. I am just posing the follow question as a devils advocate. I would appreciate some thought out replies, even by some "law-dogs."

NOTE: I quote a real event, but speak in a "what if" manner.

===================
I posted this isI know this was a skydiver incident, but want to approach the "why" as it relates to B.A.S.E..

This is the QUOTE from DZ:

Quote

Johnson said King was "very calm and embarrassed, he knew the danger he was in."

Asked if Brattleboro was going to send King a bill for his rescue, a trend in many communities for feats of derring-do and carelessness, Johnson rejected it forcefully.

"Absolutely not," he said. "He's been through enough."



Devils Advocate here... So a skydiver is given a reprieve for a rescue bill, whereas some BASE jumpers are not. Ok, I realize that the jumper was possibly doing a legal jump, but what if he was jumping a canopy he was not pro rated for?

"If" he was jumping a canopy he wasn't rated for, how does charging a BASE jumper for a rescue for a non-legal jump differ. All things being equal, some would tend to think that the skyjumper should get charged a rescue bill.

So what is the determining factor in deciding who has to repay a rescue bill or not?

I am not even throwing in the idea that there are PLENTY of things that our rescue personnel do that people should repay, but it seems only certain things are recouped.
Leroy


..I knew I was an unwanted baby when I saw my bath toys were a toaster and a radio...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agreed, but what if the jumper was not using a canopy he was "pro rated" for? Doesn't that make his jump less than legal?

This makes apples and oranges more like 2 apples...
Leroy


..I knew I was an unwanted baby when I saw my bath toys were a toaster and a radio...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see your point. This is one example. I'm sure not every base jumper has been charged for their rescues either.

When a base jumper goes into wires in front of a crowd of spectators and makes national news, they probably deserve a freebie rescue too. :)
What's the pro rating have to do with anything? Did the demo require a pro rating? I don't think he's pro rated. He's not "rated" on any canopy. As long as the demo didn't require the rating, what's your point?

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was making the analogy or comparison that "IF" the jump was not technically legal due to not complying with FAA requirements, THEN how would this differ from a BASE jump (oe enter other sport) where you would need a rescue and were charged a bill?


Basically saying that if a BASE jump (oe enter other sport) wasn't legal, AND they were charged a rescure bill, why wouldn't a skydiver on a "non legal" jump be charged a rescue bill?

This is all theortical in nature of course.

I am talking in general "what if's" and not specifically about the actuall jumper.
Leroy


..I knew I was an unwanted baby when I saw my bath toys were a toaster and a radio...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not pissed off at all.... I just posed a disscussion question , thats all.

How about this though.

Now, you do realize that there are BASE jumps that are legal right? ;) Occasionally these jumps do require rescue.

How do you think this changes the posed question?

1. Say the BASE jump was a legal one and got hurt needing rescue.
2. Say the Skydive was a legal one and got hurt needing rescue.

Would this change anything?

Leroy


..I knew I was an unwanted baby when I saw my bath toys were a toaster and a radio...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Would this change anything?

Of course.:|

Got any real world examples?

Have all your BASE jumps been legal? All my skydives have been.


We are not talking about you or me here. But, congratulations on your perfect skydiving record though, seriously very admirable!

Please, You seem to be on a higher "plane" of intelligence. Do not come at me with your seemingly attack'ish attitude. I just posed a question that I prefaced.

Maybe I would have been better off making a story up instead of using a real situation that I asked a "what if" question to.


Bottom line is that it seems that even if a base jumper or skydiver on a legal jump gets hurt, the skydiver is more likely to not have to repay a rescure bill. Not that i have to worry... I have "insurance."
Leroy


..I knew I was an unwanted baby when I saw my bath toys were a toaster and a radio...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote


Would this change anything?

Of course.:|

Got any real world examples?


A cliff strike rescue in Moab, a bridge strike in TF.

MY 2 cents is that bot the illegal jumper or the legal jumper in EITHER sport is completely responsible for their actions including the cost of a rescue. If the rescuing agency decides to take pity on a guy and can afford to absorb the cost of the rescue, then bonus for the jumper.
----------------------------------------------
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



Bottom line is that it seems that even if a base jumper or skydiver on a legal jump gets hurt, the skydiver is more likely to not have to repay a rescure bill. Not that i have to worry... I have "insurance."

:DWell maybe a few might have been through the clouds.:)

I know you feel that a Base jumper is more likely to be charged with rescue than a skydiver, but do you have any proof? Legal is legal, bandit is not. BASE jumpers get more respect in Europe and other parts of the world than the U.S. I believe that is true. But what of Base jumpers doing it legally, as in Idaho Falls or West Virginia on bridge day?:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just clarify...you don't need a PRO to do a demo, or for that matter be a member of the USPA to still do a legal demo.

What the USPA and PRO rating does is make it easier to get the paperwork through, and obtain affordable 3rd party liability insurance.

The only thing that would happen if you did a demo on a canopy your were not 'rated' on, is possibly void the insurance.

And to address your other issue, I do know a demo jumper that was charged for a ladder truck rescue following a bad choice of landing spots during a legal demo...the situation you are using as an illustration is merely a small town giving a guy a break.










~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone think the higher risk of base jumps, including limited canopy time and closer proximity to bad terrain and obstacles increases the likelihood of needing rescue? Perhaps these factors weigh into the rescuing agencies minds when they decide whether or not to charge. I don't know.

I'd like to try some BASE jumps. I just can't get a kitchen pass. [:/]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to try some BASE jumps. I just can't get a kitchen pass. [:/]




I hear ya brother!

I did some B.A.S.E. jumping 'back in the day', the kids came along and the wife made me promise to quit until the kids were gone...

I keep throwin' 'em out, she keeps bringing 'em back! :S


*all I need is an "A" for my number!! :)










~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Bottom line is that it seems that even if a BASE jumper or skydiver on a legal jump gets hurt, the skydiver is more likely to not have to repay a rescure bill.



What evidence do you have of this?

The municipality for which I'm an elected official doesn't try to recover rescue costs from anyone at the moment. Car accident, heart attack, airplane crash, or even skydiver. Nothing much 'baseable' in town but not that either. Some municipalities have chosen to try to recover rescue costs rather than put the burden on their citizens at large. Some have a mixed policy. But find me a policy that says base jumpers pay and skydivers don't. It's more likely that the municipality where base jumping is occuring has decided to charge base jumpers and doesn't have any skydiving activity and the municipality that has skydiving activity and doesn't charge for rescue doesn't have base jumping.

You can not compare experience across municipalities. Most will be deciding this issue on a global basis and it will vary from municipality to municipality. You've tried to make it a legal/non-legal jump thing. Some places DO try to recover the costs associated with emergency response caused by ANY illegal activity.

You need to prove your premis before you ask if it is reasonable. I believe your assuming bias where there very well not be any. There MAY be between legal and illegal and it will be codified.
I'm old for my age.
Terry Urban
D-8631
FAA DPRE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you serious? This is just a thread on an internet site....

Is your life so dull you have to comment on (in your words) "how dull mine is?"

My life is never dull... making soldiers out of civilians is never DULL. lol

much love
Leroy


..I knew I was an unwanted baby when I saw my bath toys were a toaster and a radio...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Just clarify...you don't need a PRO to do a demo, or for that matter be a member of the USPA to still do a legal demo.
...



That clarifies some things for sure... I assumed that jumps that needed a pro rating delt with the FAA through USPA. Now I know. Pro rating is done through the USPA only.

Hit me up for an "A" jump if you are ever in MO
Leroy


..I knew I was an unwanted baby when I saw my bath toys were a toaster and a radio...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>>A BASE jumper is a criminal trespasser, and they get treated as such, especially when they screw up.
I'm not a criminal. It's the system that's criminal!

Okay, except for maybe that bank job with Airtwardo . . .

NickD :)BASE 194

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

[
That clarifies some things for sure... I assumed that jumps that needed a pro rating delt with the FAA through USPA. Now I know. Pro rating is done through the USPA only.

a PRO rating allows you to pass over a crowd lower and land closer to the crowd. The FAA knows all this and may require PRO ratings if the demo is tight enough. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



*all I need is an "A" for my number!! :)



Good lord ... you're in prime location. You could have it tonight if you wanted to. Get the pass, you already know the people and if some odd reason you don't, let me know,

You can even pull high if you want to!
My grammar sometimes resembles that of magnetic refrigerator poetry... Ghetto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0