Phil1111 1,173 #26 July 30, 2010 Quote Quote Quote he is a NASCAR driver. 2 dimensional skills, lots of money and a huge ego. at least he did not kill the Mrs. Sounds like he could afford to hire a competent pilot. exactly! Mr. Roush is a competent pilot with over 4000 hours of ME jet PIC time. A story about the jet involved in this accident and Mr. Roush is here: http://www.flyingmag.com/pilot-reports/jets/its-all-about-speed Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
futuredivot 0 #27 July 31, 2010 After talking to a WHOLE lot of other qualified witnesses, not quite how it went down-some details blown out of proportionYou are only as strong as the prey you devour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #28 July 31, 2010 QuoteAfter talking to a WHOLE lot of other qualified witnesses, not quite how it went down-some details blown out of proportion Care to share your findings? Even the short version? I saw a screen grab from a video of him on very short final extremely nose high, as-in higher than it would have been climbing out after take-off. I also saw a pic from further down the runway where the nose was pointed at least 45 degrees off runway heading, and the right wing was low and about to hit the ground. Fill in the blanks? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Calvin19 0 #29 July 31, 2010 I hate defending a NASCAR muppet in any way, but if anyone else has flown into Oshkosh during the event you know it is pretty weird. The air traffic is controled in a very unique way as there is SOOO MUCH air traffic trying to land in the area. Nearly all radio is one-way for ATC, and aircraft are meant to comply or leave the area Of course, this is NO REASON to fly unsafe, unpracticed landing patterns, but I bet he got flustered and overloaded flying such a fast airplane being instructed to land in such short sequence. -SPACE- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #30 July 31, 2010 QuoteI bet he got flustered and overloaded flying such a fast airplane being instructed to land in such short sequence. Maybe, but at the same time controllers aren't going to ask a jet to fly the same pattern as a Cub. They would have allowed him the room to fly a standard pattern it whatever his normal approach speed would be. On top of that, the guy has 3500 hours PIC in a Citation, and 800-some hours in the Premiere (not to mention all the time in smaller planes and his P-51). Hopefully when he's feeling better, he'll give us the full story. If not, between interviews with the pilot and the 10,000 pilot-spectators, plus the info from his GPS and the wreckage, I have a pretty good feelnig the NTSB will figure this one with a high degree of certainty. It might take a year, but they'll get it done. Speaking of which, did they post a preliminary report yet? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squirrel 0 #31 July 31, 2010 Quote", but if anyone else has flown into Oshkosh during the event you know it is pretty weird. The air traffic is controled in a very unique way as there is SOOO MUCH air traffic trying to land in the area. Nearly all radio is one-way for ATC, and aircraft are meant to comply or leave the area" there is a nice little write up in the August issue of Sport Aviation with some good drawings of the event...I have been once, and since then started to fly a Weight Shift or "Trike"...I'll tell you this...I would never get in the air around that area...too many planes in the sky to make flying fun for me. ________________________________ Where is Darwin when you need him? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkydiveJack 1 #32 July 31, 2010 Has anyone found a real link to an actual video of the approach and crash of Jack's airplane? Every link I found on Google or YouTube is either a scam or shows post accident video. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Calvin19 0 #33 July 31, 2010 QuoteQuoteI bet he got flustered and overloaded flying such a fast airplane being instructed to land in such short sequence. Maybe, but at the same time controllers aren't going to ask a jet to fly the same pattern as a Cub. They would have allowed him the room to fly a standard pattern it whatever his normal approach speed would be. On top of that, the guy has 3500 hours PIC in a Citation, and 800-some hours in the Premiere (not to mention all the time in smaller planes and his P-51). Hopefully when he's feeling better, he'll give us the full story. If not, between interviews with the pilot and the 10,000 pilot-spectators, plus the info from his GPS and the wreckage, I have a pretty good feelnig the NTSB will figure this one with a high degree of certainty. It might take a year, but they'll get it done. Speaking of which, did they post a preliminary report yet? whatever. I have 15 hours in a A320 and 5 hours in a 757. but I have never flown one alone. -SPACE- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Calvin19 0 #34 July 31, 2010 meaning, if all those 3500 hours are legitimate, he still messed up pretty bad. Highly doubt any kind of mechanical failure. that thing will fly fine on one motor, especially with only one girl in back. -SPACE- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davelepka 4 #35 August 1, 2010 Quote if all those 3500 hours are legitimate, Read over the first part of this article, it outlines his flight training, qualifications, and experience to date. The article is at least a year old, so the reported 800 hours in the Premiere is probably in the range of 1000 to 1200 hours as of the time of the crash. http://www.flyingmag.com/pilot-reports/jets/its-all-about-speed I fully understand the 'more money than brains' concept, but this guy is accomplished enough (aviation wise) and has enough solo PIC jet time, that I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, and not assume that he just blew it. It terms of mechanical failure, there are a lot more systems than just the engines that can fail, but modern jets have so many redundant systems (like the second engine), it is hard to imagine a failure leading to what happened. Like I said, between Roush, and the 10,000 pilots who saw this go down (not everyone at Oshkosh was looking in the right direction), they have to be able to piece this one together pretty accurately. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jumpwally 0 #36 August 2, 2010 ....hey that doesn't mean much . there are plenty of skydivers with thousands of jump that went in,,,, smile, be nice, enjoy life FB # - 1083 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #37 August 2, 2010 Quote ....hey that doesn't mean much . there are plenty of skydivers with thousands of jump that went in,,,, And he is also 68 years old. That is well into the age bracket where many people who were formerly excellent drivers in the past, start becoming dangerous on the road."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NickDG 23 #38 August 3, 2010 First "As it Happened" photos . . . (The "photographers" in the foreground are all lens and no balls!) NickD Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,146 #39 August 3, 2010 QuoteI hate defending a NASCAR muppet in any way, but if anyone else has flown into Oshkosh during the event you know it is pretty weird. The air traffic is controled in a very unique way as there is SOOO MUCH air traffic trying to land in the area. Nearly all radio is one-way for ATC, and aircraft are meant to comply or leave the area Of course, this is NO REASON to fly unsafe, unpracticed landing patterns, but I bet he got flustered and overloaded flying such a fast airplane being instructed to land in such short sequence. I've flown in (in my Mooney) a bunch of times. It is indeed weird, and a much higher stress level landing than normal.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 16 #40 August 3, 2010 From some of the earlier posts, it sounds like he was put in a tight pattern more suited to a prop driven airplane, which can increase their thrust rapidly in low energy situations. The FAA advocates long, stabilized final approaches for all turbojet aircraft. Trying to bring a biz jet in like a Piper Cub is a job for airshow pilots doing demonstrations, not day to day operations. Was there really traffic in the pattern that was a factor? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jumpdude 0 #41 August 4, 2010 Quote First "As it Happened" photos . . . (The "photographers" in the foreground are all lens and no balls!) NickD You forgot this one!Refuse to Lose!!! Failure is NOT an option! 1800skyrideripoff.com Nashvilleskydiving.org Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
futuredivot 0 #42 August 4, 2010 Quote I've flown in (in my Mooney) a bunch of times. It is indeed weird, and a much higher stress level landing than normal. Mooney, Rock your wings.You are only as strong as the prey you devour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Calvin19 0 #43 August 4, 2010 QuoteQuote I've flown in (in my Mooney) a bunch of times. It is indeed weird, and a much higher stress level landing than normal. Mooney, Rock your wings. Mooney, Rock your wings. , , , Mooney follow yellow cub on 100' final at 45kts. Yellow cub be sure to do a short field rollout and hesitate as long as you want on the runway threshhold. Mooney DO NOT go around. rock wing if you will comply or GTFO -SPACE- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerrob 643 #44 August 4, 2010 Quote First "As it Happened" photos . . . (The "photographers" in the foreground are all lens and no balls!) NickD ....................................................................... Yeah! If you are that close to the scene of the crash, you are already dead. Might as well shoot a few more frames and go out in glory! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beerlight 0 #45 August 20, 2010 Hope not a re-post. More photos...... http://jalopnik.com/5614781/jack-roush-plane-crash-series//gallery/1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #46 August 20, 2010 NTSB Preliminary report: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20100728X70427&key=1"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davjohns 1 #47 August 20, 2010 Happy Birthday Deedy!I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites