0
mysky

New PD Reserves with super small pack volume?

Recommended Posts

I hope this hasn't already made it to this forum as I have searched to see if it has been discussed but could not find anything so please forgive me if I am recycling these questions. Has anyone seen or heard anything about PD's new reserves that are going to have an incredibly small pack volume. Does anyone know if these are actually going to be released any time soon? I heard that a new 143 will pack like a 106 and a 160 will pack like a 113. Anyone have any info on this. Thanks for your help.


There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those that know how to count, and those who don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>Does anyone know if these are actually going to be released any time soon?

Read the latest Skydiver magazine. It has an article on them.

I am looking forward to them, since I generally jump small mains and large reserves - but most manufacturers make rigs for similar sized mains and reserves. It will be nice to be able to fit a Nitro 108 and a PD143 into a container that fits them both well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now I'm gonna ask a dumb question (you have been warned)

give me one good reason why given the choice between a 109 and a 143 Reserve (or a X reserve and a reserve 60-90% bigger) that will fit your container you would go with the smaller reserve ... for the purpose of this price is not a good reason unles the price dif is 2X or greater and ASSUME they are both PD quality in construction/lifetime/flight profile

Good Judgment comes from experience...a lot of experience comes from bad
judgment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>give me one good reason why given the choice between a 109 and a 143
> Reserve (or a X reserve and a reserve 60-90% bigger) that will fit your
> container you would go with the smaller reserve . . .

Because

a) the rig would weigh less; I'd need less drag for bigways

b) the rig would be smaller, and thus wouldn't hit me in the top of the butt like the Icon I-4 does.

c) the smaller rig would better fit my main (a Nitro 108) without having the closing loop be somewhat loose even at its shortest.

Now, a lot of that doesn't apply if manufacturers made containers that fit 100 sq ft mains and 150 sq ft reserves. Most don't.

(Just to make it clear, I am assuming you meant a choice between a 143 sq ft reserve that packed up like a 143 sq ft reserve, or one that packed up like a 109 sq ft reserve.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

give me one good reason why given the choice between a 109 and a 143 Reserve (or a X reserve and a reserve 60-90% bigger) that will fit your container you would go with the smaller reserve



There are some times I don't want to be a test pilot.
----------------------------------------------
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My fear is that a jumper will order a container sized for PD's newest reserve, but cheap-out and buy an old PD reserve with the same surface area.
Then he will wonder why his rigger went insane struggling to stuff his used reserve into a container that is far too tiny/tight!
Will PD ship its new reserves with straight jackets for all the riggers they drive insane?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0