JohnMitchell 16 #26 January 21, 2012 Quote So what yer sayin' is...Two balls equals One strike! Funny! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #27 January 21, 2012 QuoteQuoteYes. I hope this happened in LA. This fuckhead will now be on the sex offenders list forever. This is the problem with these sex offender lists. I don't want a list that puts stupid frat pranks in the same category as child abuse. He is 32 years old. Married. Father of two. Not a frat dick. Anyone who feels entitled to put his genitals on another defenseless person (the pussy wouldn't do it to a conscious individual) should be given an indication that this isn't appropriate. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldwomanc6 60 #28 January 21, 2012 What is amazing to me, is that people will do things in a crowd that they will never consider doing alone. Mob mentality, I guess. The other thing that amazes me is that people will do stuff with 50 phones/cameras (that they have got to know are there) pointed at them that they would never consider otherwise. Mob mentality, I guess. I'm giving this idiot the benefit of the doubt. If it was just the two of them, with no witnesses, I'm assuming no balls in the face action would have happened. He might have even put the passed-out-guy into bed and tucked him in with out any felony hanky-panky. lisa WSCR 594 FB 1023 CBDB 9 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TriGirl 343 #29 January 21, 2012 Quote Now, I know that you take your chances by being idiotic enough to pass out in a Krystal restaurant.... Apparently the AL fan is being brought up on sexual abuse charges. Do you think it's justified? Just imagine if the victim in this scenario were a woman. I doubt the question would even have come up. Yeah, it's sexual assault, regardless of the gender of the victim. This is something that, whether is being taught or not, just isn't getting through the thick skulls of the D-bags. If you want to be an idiot, fine -- there are other ways. But this is sexual assault, no question.See the upside, and always wear your parachute! -- Christopher Titus Shut Up & Jump! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krip 2 #30 January 21, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Yes. I hope this happened in LA. This fuckhead will now be on the sex offenders list forever. This is the problem with these sex offender lists. I don't want a list that puts stupid frat pranks in the same category as child abuse. He is 32 years old. Married. Father of two. Not a frat dick. Anyone who feels entitled to put his genitals on another defenseless person (the pussy wouldn't do it to a conscious individual) should be given an indication that this isn't appropriate. Hi Lawrocket Thanks for the facts. 32yo married father of two kids I'm not a lawyerBut IMO This could end up really really bad.Or Best case a sweet plea deal and a hefty lawyer Bill. Some people Just don't get it. R.One Jump Wonder Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
virgin-burner 1 #31 January 22, 2012 doesnt teabagging come from online-games? there it can be kinda funny.. and to be honest, it's RELATIVELY harmless to what some of the soccer-fans would do to you if you ran into them wearing the wrong colors.. still, it's stupid!“Some may never live, but the crazy never die.” -Hunter S. Thompson "No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try." -Yoda Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VTmotoMike08 0 #32 January 23, 2012 Ya, its a bad thing to do and all... but I know I have seen this exact same act happen on the drop zone too. As a group, we are no better. I'm sure there are plenty of college students who find this abhorrent as well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Krip 2 #33 January 23, 2012 Quote Ya, its a bad thing to do and all... but I know I have seen this exact same act happen on the drop zone too. As a group, we are no better. I'm sure there are plenty of college students who find this abhorrent as well. It used to be what happened at the dz stayed at the DZ. Pre net things were discussed around the fireplace. Or by smoke signals. No cell phones no pay phones no bldgs. no computers no digital camera's. Just the way it was. IMO the end of the WFFC at quincy was due to alowing the wuffo's to mingle with the jumpers on the DZ. To bad. Olldfiddle may know the true story. I don't. R. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piisfish 140 #34 January 23, 2012 Quote Quote Quote Man, if he at least trimmed his pubic region, we could see his genitals. I didn't realize seeing a man's genitals was that important to you. Ouch, Skymama.I think he's just sayin' if you're gonna hang it out in public, have a little pride in your junk. Don't treat it like, uh, junk. There have been photos and videos of me naked in public... And despite the fact it was not premeditated, I know that if I am at risk of spending part of the night naked in public, I always make sure I would at least look half decent scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dorbie 0 #35 January 23, 2012 "Brian Downing, 32, of Smiths Station, Ala., was booked on charges of sexual battery and obscenity" "Hibbett Sports Inc., confirmed Thursday that the company fired Downing on Wednesday." http://jjb.yuku.com/topic/700780/Alabama-Fan-Arrested--sexual-assault--passed--LSU-fan http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2012/01/alabama_fan_wanted_in_sexual_a_1.html "His bond was set at $10,000 by a magistrate this morning. Downing was subsequently released from jail" http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2012/01/bond_set_at_10000_for_alabama.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dorbie 0 #36 January 23, 2012 Quote I'm giving this idiot the benefit of the doubt. If it was just the two of them, with no witnesses, I'm assuming no balls in the face action would have happened. He might have even put the passed-out-guy into bed and tucked him in with out any felony hanky-panky. Nobody else in the room felt the need to sexually humiliate the victim or bare their genitals in public. Just this guy. So on whatever bell curve you measure normal, in this instance he's the one on the periphery who chose to be a sex pervert. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hcsvader 1 #37 January 23, 2012 Guess I'm lucky my friends don't bring out the video camera... ... And if I ever pass out with my shoes on i am in so much fucking trouble.Have you seen my pants? it"s a rough life, Livin' the dream >:) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squeak 17 #38 January 23, 2012 Quote Guess I'm lucky my friends don't bring out the video camera... ... And if I ever pass out with my shoes on i am in so much fucking trouble. meh, we just use you for a drum like we did everything elseYou are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky) My Life ROCKS! How's yours doing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmytavino 16 #39 January 23, 2012 nasty.... for Sure... but what should we expect in todays age of rudeness, show-offs and rampant video coverage of just about EVERYTHING... Drunk LSU Fans + Drunk Alabama Fans = this sort of idiocy..... imho jmy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #40 January 23, 2012 Little miss #10 with the camera and everyone in that room who stood-by and watched and laughed needs to be charged as 'accessories'. The 'tea-bagger' needs to be charged with everything he can possibly be charged with! I really agree with your idea of his being thrown into 'gen-pop' for a year or so. Plus, he should be allowed to carry and be officially registered with the title of 'sex offender' for the rest of his life. The pervert piece of shit!!! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
virgin-burner 1 #41 January 23, 2012 lemme guess, u're an alabama-fan!? “Some may never live, but the crazy never die.” -Hunter S. Thompson "No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try." -Yoda Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #42 January 23, 2012 Nope! They aren't in Texas. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #43 January 23, 2012 Quote Plus, he should be allowed to carry and be officially registered with the title of 'sex offender' for the rest of his life. The pervert piece of shit!!! I have to respectfully disagree with you re: the sexual offender registry. Let's all take a breath and get some perspective here. This guy didn't use his genitals as a tool of doing something sexual, he used them as a tool of doing something gross - in more or less the same category as "pantsing" someone, or giving them a swirlie in a toilet: it's disgusting, but it's really not sexual. Lets' face it, most of us have done some pretty f-ed up things, either when we were young(er), or intoxicated on one thing or another, or both. (Think drunken, wild parties at the DZ, at the frat house, at bachelors' parties, etc. "How did I get here? Why am I naked?" Etc.) But that's really not my main point. The public policy reason why sexual offender registry laws exist is because it is perceived that those who commit true sexual offenses very often have a high likelihood to re-offend, so the public (arguably) benefits from being warned-away from them in advance. The stated purpose of the registry (reality aside) is not to be punitive against the convict, but to be protective of society. That being the case, placing someone on a public registry of sexual offenders for teabagging someone as a drunken stunt is as inappropriate as putting them the registry for giving someone a swirlie or a wedgie. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
virgin-burner 1 #44 January 23, 2012 finally some perspective..“Some may never live, but the crazy never die.” -Hunter S. Thompson "No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try." -Yoda Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #45 January 23, 2012 I do, appreciate your clarifying the 'sex offender' thing. Where I got the idea that it was a sexual type offense was in the video, the 'offender' clearly 'humps' the passed-out guy's face. How do we know that he wasn't trying to 'work' his genitals into the passed-out guy's mouth? Also, I was always told that being drunk is no excuse! I've heard that from judges. I'd like to say, I was not trying to be 'knee-jerk' in my response. I just find these types of things extremely repulsive and down right 'bullying'. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
virgin-burner 1 #46 January 23, 2012 well, you guys can already get arrested for being drunk in public - gosh, i'd get soooo much in trouble there at times..“Some may never live, but the crazy never die.” -Hunter S. Thompson "No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try." -Yoda Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #47 January 23, 2012 Quote How do we know that he wasn't trying to 'work' his genitals into the passed-out guy's mouth? If he was, then that might be a reasonable point to draw the line, and say that he's crossed into a "sexual offense". Quote Also, I was always told that being drunk is no excuse! I've heard that from judges. And I generally agree with that, at least re: guilt or innocence (although I do think it's a reasonable factor to consider at the time of sentencing). Having said that, a key element of every criminal offense is "mens rea", which we refer to as "criminal intent". Intoxication can muddy up the waters enough to make it a tough call for a jury. So the focus should be on whether his conduct did or did not cross the line into being a sexual offense - not just re: the physics of the act itself, but also a factual determination (which really needs to be done by a jury) as to his actual intent. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #48 January 23, 2012 QuoteQuote How do we know that he wasn't trying to 'work' his genitals into the passed-out guy's mouth? If he was, then that might be a reasonable point to draw the line, and say that he's crossed into a "sexual offense". Quote Also, I was always told that being drunk is no excuse! I've heard that from judges. And I generally agree with that, at least re: guilt or innocence (although I do think it's a reasonable factor to consider at the time of sentencing). Having said that, a key element of every criminal offense is "mens rea", which we refer to as "criminal intent". Intoxication can muddy up the waters enough to make it a tough call for a jury. So the focus should be on whether his conduct did or did not cross the line into being a sexual offense - not just re: the physics of the act itself, but also a factual determination (which really needs to be done by a jury) as to his actual intent. Seems to me. when he un-zipped his britches and flopped-out his genitals, he wasn't intending to play mumbly-peg! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydiver30960 0 #50 January 23, 2012 Quote Seems to me. when he un-zipped his britches and flopped-out his genitals, he wasn't intending to play mumbly-peg! Chuck Until this post, I thought "Mumble Peg" was nothing more than another Family Guy invention: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MoEDG5YsMo But, your post spurred a trip to Wikipedia (screw SOPA!) where I learned that it is, in fact, a real game. Now Chuck: it does mention being most popular in the late 19th/early 20th centuries. Are we to take it you were proficient at this old schoolyard pastime? Elvisio "not so young either, and seemingly catching up by the moment" Rodriguez Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
