Skyrad 0 #26 April 13, 2012 That is a question of pure genius.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,149 #27 April 13, 2012 Peeple shud spel proper liek wot I does.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #28 April 13, 2012 Quote Quote Then, there's the mis-use of the word 'what' in place of the word 'which'. Chuck which you talk'n 'bout willis? Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldwomanc6 60 #29 April 16, 2012 Holy, moly: "Prolly" What's with that?lisa WSCR 594 FB 1023 CBDB 9 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MikeJD 0 #30 April 16, 2012 Quote Holy, moly: "Prolly" What's with that? At least that one's deliberate. Did you know that one suggested origin of 'o.k.' is 'orl korrekt', following an 1830s craze for jokey spelling? This stuff ain't new! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
