1969912 0 #1 February 15, 2013 Turn audio volume down http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=b0cRHsApzt8 There are several other videos on youtube showing what looks like the same event. http://rt.com/news/meteorite-crash-urals-chelyabinsk-283/ This sounds like BS: "According to unconfirmed reports, the meteorite was intercepted by an air defense unit at the Urzhumka settlement near Chelyabinsk. A missile salvo reportedly blew the meteorite to pieces at an altitude of 20 kilometers." "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #2 February 15, 2013 Quote...the meteorite was intercepted by an air defense unit at the Urzhumka settlement near Chelyabinsk. Yes, that would be complete and utter non-sense. Bolides explode all by themselves and it would be virtually impossible to launch an intercept with the zero notice the military would have by any technology anyone currently has.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1969912 0 #3 February 15, 2013 It was a big one: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/02/15/injuries-reported-after-meteorite-falls-in-russia-ural-mountains/ "Once we got to the point where twenty/something's needed a place on the corner that changed the oil in their cars we were doomed . . ." -NickDG Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #4 February 15, 2013 I have it on good authority that it's the first wave of an attack on Earth by THEM, and you're all fools if you don't believe it. In the meantime, I'm prepared. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #5 February 15, 2013 INteresting. And coinciding with the asteroid fly by today. My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #6 February 15, 2013 I wonder if that had happened here would our nukes have launched in response?Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #7 February 15, 2013 QuoteI wonder if that had happened here would our nukes have launched in response? I'd certainly toss that football. Where should we target? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airtwardo 7 #8 February 15, 2013 Quote Quote I wonder if that had happened here would our nukes have launched in response? I'd certainly toss that football. Where should we target? Alabama! ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
babz 0 #9 February 15, 2013 QuoteI wonder if that had happened here would our nukes have launched in response? If a meteor came over a city? I'd hope not... and where'd you aim for - the Kaipur belt? ;-) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 35 #10 February 15, 2013 Quote Quote Quote I wonder if that had happened here would our nukes have launched in response? I'd certainly toss that football. Where should we target? Alabama! Texas!! "Mediocre people don't like high achievers, and high achievers don't like mediocre people." - SIX TIME National Champion coach Nick Saban Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #11 February 15, 2013 QuoteI wonder if that had happened here would our nukes have launched in response? It already has happened, but with no nukes fired. I recall a fairly large one over SoCal in the 60s. What I find interesting is think people recognized it for what it was back then and didn't jump to wild speculation.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,590 #12 February 15, 2013 Quote INteresting. And coinciding with the asteroid fly by today. That was the mothership."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 210 #13 February 15, 2013 Quote Quote I wonder if that had happened here would our nukes have launched in response? If a meteor came over a city? I'd hope not... and where'd you aim for - the Kaipur belt? ;-) No no. I think back in the day under the psychology of Mutual Assured Destruction our nukes would launch automatically if they were threatened. Launch at their targets...not at the meteor. Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lawrocket 3 #14 February 15, 2013 "And so, because of the automated and irrevocable decision-making process which rules out human meddling, the Doomsday machine is terrifying and simple to understand... and completely credible and convincing. Of course, the whole point of a Doomsday Machine is lost, if you keep it a secret! Why didn't you tell the world, eh? MEIN FUHRER! I CAN WALK!" My wife is hotter than your wife. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,117 #15 February 15, 2013 QuoteINteresting. And coinciding with the asteroid fly by today. "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, and three times is enemy action." Goldfinger... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,117 #16 February 15, 2013 I saw the Park Forest meteorite in 2003 (Park Forest is about 5 miles from my house). That was very impressive with a very loud boom that shook the windows, but tiny compared to this event.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airtwardo 7 #17 February 15, 2013 Quote Quote Quote I wonder if that had happened here would our nukes have launched in response? If a meteor came over a city? I'd hope not... and where'd you aim for - the Kaipur belt? ;-) No no. I think back in the day under the psychology of Mutual Assured Destruction our nukes would launch automatically if they were threatened. Launch at their targets...not at the meteor. "Would you like to play a GAME?" ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #18 February 15, 2013 Why does the serious shit always seem to be in Siberia? Can't be coincidence. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #19 February 15, 2013 QuoteWhy does the serious shit always seem to be in Siberia? Can't be coincidence. Confirmation bias. The reality is, the serious shit happens all over the planet. When it comes to meteors the evidence is usually subtle due to erosion, but in some cases it's not. There's a great example in Arizona. http://www.meteorcrater.com/quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #20 February 15, 2013 QuoteQuoteWhy does the serious shit always seem to be in Siberia? Can't be coincidence. Confirmation bias. Oh, I don't think so. I think there's an actual plan. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skydiver30960 0 #21 February 15, 2013 So for all the times people have ranted "You're more likely to be hit by a meteor than win the Powerball!..." There are now several hundred people on the wrong side of that equation. Does that mean my individual chances of winning the lottery have gone up? Elvisio "off to buy a two dollar dream" Rodriguez Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #22 February 15, 2013 No. That's part of what is known as "Gambler's Fallacy." The odds remain the same for each individual roll of the dice.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 2,117 #23 February 15, 2013 QuoteQuoteQuoteWhy does the serious shit always seem to be in Siberia? Can't be coincidence. Confirmation bias. Oh, I don't think so. I think there's an actual plan. investmentwatchblog.com/breaking-meteor-crash-this-time-in-cuba/ Three times - it IS enemy action!... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 4 #24 February 15, 2013 What I'm wondering about is if the last time 2012DA14 passed by Earth a few chunks didnt get torn off and ended up making a train of objects similar to what hit Jupiter with comet Shoemaker. That while we are now confident about 2012DA14 and all known objects like it, there may turn out to be smaller leading and trailing debris we should consider as well with very large ones that are projected to come close but we know aren't going to hit.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 2 #25 February 15, 2013 QuoteWhat I'm wondering about is if the last time 2012DA14 passed by Earth a few chunks didnt get torn off and ended up making a train of objects similar to what hit Jupiter with comet Shoemaker. That while we are now confident about 2012DA14 and all known objects like it, there may turn out to be smaller leading and trailing debris we should consider as well with very large ones that are projected to come close but we know aren't going to hit. That's what THEY want us to think. It's the perfect cover. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites