0
PD_FreeFlier

sabre compared to sabre2

Recommended Posts

> how are the swoops on a sabre1 135 compared to a sabre2 135?

Very different. The Sabre 2 doesn't have a very long recovery arc, but it's still better than the Sabre 1. The 2 has more lift in the flare, and it happens later in the stroke. They are very different animals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I own a sabre2 135 and love it. But we had a little discussion the other day about PD doing better selling the canopy if they would have changed the name completely away from "saber"

It kinda makes sense because a lot of people associate the saber with wicked and hard openings.

Sorry about getting off the subject kinda but just some input into the sabre2.


--I don't even know enough to know that I dont know--

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Totally different beasts. I have about 400 jumps on a Sabre 120 and 300 on a Sabre2 107. Both canopies are well rounded, so I think that's why they stuck with the name (that, and the Sabre was wildly popular).

The openings: The Sabre2's openings are about a trillion times better than the Sabre. The Sabre slammed you if you didn't pack it right. The Sabre2 can be packed any damn way and still give you a good opening. And I mean ANY damn way (you'd cringe at some of the wads I shoved into that bag). Both will fly straight in line twists. The Sabre2 might rotate you up to once in the event of line twists -- no big deal.

The front: On my Sabre, I threw 180s from about 300'. On my Sabre2, they were between 400' and 450' (270s and 360s were from about 450' and 500' respectively). Front riser pressure builds much more slowly on the Sabre2. I even threw the occasional 450 on final, and 720 up top, with the Sabre2. Very light front riser pressue that builds up over about 7 - 8 seconds. The Sabre is done within 5 seconds. For more conservative swoops, double fronts are easy to hold and 90s build up decent speed.

The middle: The Sabre2's full flight glide is noticeably steeper than the Sabre, and rears get it to about the Sabre's normal glide. Rear riser pressure is higher on the Sabre2. The Sabre is trimmed so flat, there's not really any place for rear risers on landing.

The back: The original Sabre had damn near no flare when compared to the Sabre2. The Sabre2 has a LOT of bottom end. Toggle turns are much quicker on the Sabre2. Toggle pressure is higher on the Sabre2. On straight-in landings, the flare can be very staged -- which is good for beginners who are still working on timing out their.

The Sabre2 moreso than the Sabre, IMO, is a very good canopy to go from a conservative flying style to a more aggressive one, for beginner to intermediate canopy pilots. It's a good canopy on which to learn all the facets of canopy flight, right on up to landing swoops on purely on rear risers. Both make kickass, worry-free wingsuit canopies, as well.
"¯"`-._.-¯) ManBird (¯-._.-´"¯"

Click

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0