masterrig 1 #51 September 8, 2004 Also, John Sherman holds a degree in engineering. The 'new' line of Racer is really pretty good looking and retains that 'comfy' reputation. As well as the idea of 'form follows function'. I guess, if you were to argue Ford v Chevy, the Racer would be an Edsel. Highly under-rated. They just lacked 'looks'. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teason 0 #52 September 8, 2004 QuoteYeah, but Scratch I bet you still miss your front mount reserve too huh? Ahh, it was probably a Strong pop top too! lol (well at least Scratch will get that one) I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teason 0 #53 September 8, 2004 Maybe this should be in the useless trivia thread but did you know John has the patent for the one pin pop top? I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mjosparky 4 #54 September 8, 2004 QuoteQuoteYeah, but Scratch I bet you still miss your front mount reserve too huh? Ahh, it was probably a Strong pop top too! lol (well at least Scratch will get that one) It's Ted's invention, not John's. SparkyMy idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
riggerrob 643 #55 September 8, 2004 QuoteMaybe this should be in the useless trivia thread but did you know John has the patent for the one pin pop top? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John Sherman may hold a patent for a one-pin Pop-Top, but he was never able to make it work with a reasonable ripcord pull force. The secret is transferring the load from the center loop to the circumferance. Stefan Ertler holds a German patent on the domed cap that makes 1-pin Pop-tops practical for Teardrops. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teason 0 #56 September 8, 2004 Yes, you're right. Jumpshack paid royalties to strong to use the pop top. The Racer can be recorded as a chest resrve because the origional design was close to the pop top chest.I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teason 0 #57 September 8, 2004 QuoteJohn Sherman may hold a patent for a one-pin Pop-Top, but he was never able to make it work with a reasonable ripcord pull force. I thought he didn't like it because you can twist it up and break the closing loop I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #58 September 8, 2004 Yessir, I sure did. Dan Poynter came-up with the idea and didn't really persue it. Mr. Sherman, also came-up with the idea of the 'mini-van'. I've had the pleasure of visiting with both he and his lovely wife at the Symposium. Super people! That's a great idea! A parachute/skydiving/rigging trivia page! Wish I'd thought of it. Chuck "Fair return is no robbery!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teason 0 #59 September 8, 2004 Oooh , I've got burning rigger trivia! Rumour has it John also came up with the trash pack after a visit across the pond watching a russian way of packing rounds. Mike Fury came up with SST 'cause they called John the super swooper. Hence Super Swooper Tandem. Bill Coe has the patent for the cross brace! Arghhh I'm, going mental with useless facts!!! I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #60 September 8, 2004 Whoa there, big boy! This stuff can really light a fire under you My favorite story is about Bill Booth and the release cable routings! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teason 0 #61 September 8, 2004 I guess I should preface my comments with the words "rumour has it". I'll edit. Now ... what about those housing? I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #62 September 8, 2004 He was trying to come-up with an idea for the cable routings for the release cables (yellow). He had to make a phone call and stepped into a pay-phone booth. You know the flex cable from the reciever to the telephone box on a pay-phone? Bingo! Chuck So the story goes... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skr 1 #63 September 8, 2004 >I bet you still miss your front mount reserve too huh? Heh :-) At first I really did. I had about 1,200 jumps on a regular rig with the reserve on the front, where it belongs, so it was kind of spooky jumping with no reserve. But you could track so well in a piggyback! Actually I had already traded my feeling of safety for tracking ability by getting a pop top front reserve before Racers were invented. The trade off was that with a pop top you had to cut away before you used your reserve, which seemed like a really dubious idea, but it was flat and you could track much better with it. Actually even before that I had taken a seat pack and added another seat pack container on the back in pursuit of better tracking. The idea was a clean front plus the added area of the seat pack between my legs would act like a primitive wing suit. But in 1968 I bought an official, factory made, piggy back and all that experimenting faded into history. I still have 3 or 4 brain cells left that are a little freaked out by jumping without a reserve, so my current Racer has a belly band. I freed the horizontal back strap from the container, so the harness fits me instead of the container, and added a belly band. The belly band not only holds it all in place and puts the weight on my hips like a back pack, but the feel of it on my stomach re-assures those 3 or 4 brain cells that the world is as it should be and all is well. I don't tell people about that part though :-) :-) Skr Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #64 September 8, 2004 I'm not trying to be out of line but, your being one of the 'pioneers' of this sport, I guess, you had to be inventive. Having never jumped a 'round', I've packed a lot of them, I've heard stories of how the folks who started this sport would get a 'new' round and start cutting holes in it looking for better 'performance'. Nowadays, all one has to do is jump on the world-wide web and everything one needs is right there! Not like going to the old Army Surplus store! Passing a baton between two free-fallers was pretty hot stuff. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skr 1 #65 September 8, 2004 > Also, John Sherman holds a degree in engineering. >They just lacked 'looks'. I remember when my viewpoint changed. I was visiting John in 1976 when he lived up in Detroit. We were standing there in his basement looking at his white Racer (actually SST) propped up in the middle of the floor looking like a magazine ad. I said: "But John! It *looks* funny!". He said: "No. It's beautiful. It's functional. Form follows function, and that's beautiful.". My brain kind of went "Flip!", and suddenly it was beautiful, and the Vector approach looked funny. That's why I think a lot of gear arguments are fluff and froth. DJan has had a Mirage for 3 or 4 years, and I've packed it at least 100 times, and I've looked closely at every square inch of it. It's a great rig; they put a lot of thought into it and did it right. I've even idly speculated a couple times about getting one (don't tell John I said that! :-) :-) Except ... You know ... All those Vector spinoffs have the chest strap on backwards, and after all these years I'd probably put it on upside down with the leg straps hanging over my ears or something. Skr Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #66 September 9, 2004 Personally, I've always thought the Racer looked good. What you said, holds a lot of truth. we tend to 'follow' what is popular. Like bell-bottoms in the '70's. As for packing Racers, at first, I kinda let them 'intimidate' me. After attending one of the seminars, put-on by Jump-Shack... no problem! I really don't believe, they can be beat for comfort. As for workmanship, there is some excellent work put into them. Also, the use of Type - 13 webbing in the harness, is more adaptable to the hardware. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teason 0 #67 September 9, 2004 Type XIII is 1000lbs stronger too.I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZigZag 0 #68 October 6, 2004 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites mjosparky 4 #69 October 6, 2004 QuoteAlso, the use of Type - 13 webbing in the harness, is more adaptable to the hardware. Almost all of the hardware used today was designed for use on Type XIII webbing before there was sports gear. SparkyMy idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #70 October 6, 2004 Thanks, Sparky! Someone told me and I 'think', it was John Sherman, that, the old cotton webbing on very early harness, the weave of Type - 13 is more like that. The hardware used today dates back to then. The Type - 8 webbing sewn as a 'back-up' to Type - 7 webbing was to 'help' avoid 'slippage' of the hardware due to it's 'softer' weave. Seems to me, since the weave of the Type - 13 works better with the hardware, why doesn't 'everyone' use it? Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites teason 0 #71 October 6, 2004 It was probably John, we had the same conversation. The hardware was designed for cotton webbing. Interesting side note, when cotton webbing was replaced, the navy and the airforce didn't join forces! While the airforce had type XIII, type XXVII was made for the navy. It has similar strength, similar weave and black tracers down the side. Type VII was designed for use with cargo. Also, some canadian manufacturers use type XIII webbing. Al Macdonald uses it in his sidewinders and the late Steve West used it in his Innovater container. Just useless trivia.I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites masterrig 1 #72 October 6, 2004 No, Not 'useless trivia'. Interesting information... I learned something. Thanks for taking the time to write that. I have had the opportunity to visit with Mr. and Mrs. MacDonald. Really nice folks who put-out a really good harness-container. Anyhow, thanks again. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites zaidush 0 #73 October 6, 2004 I will never buy a second Racer. NOT because bad performance or comfortable or rigging issues or AAD issues or pop top or service or reliability - I will NOT buy one ever again because at the second you get it out of the pack- you are loosing at list 60% of what you paid. Doesn't meter why it got thr bad reputation - the bottom line is - you get a poor market of buyers and a very bad deal when you want to sell it. I'm still trying to get rid of the one i have. its a 4 years old. good condition, evarage size for intermediate - I can't get more then 150$. if it was Javelin/Vector/Mirage - i could get at least 600$! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites RMURRAY 1 #74 October 7, 2004 you get screwed selling any gear (that you bought new) - but especially the "non-2k3" racers. they are not popular in many places. I think when you buy new, you should be thinking I am keeping this for a long long time --- unless you have cash to burn. by the way, I will only ever jump a racer - but I would not buy another new one. rm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rhino 0 #75 October 7, 2004 I have a Shadow Racer, NOS, with the tuck tab mod... It is a fantastic rig... Personally I love the way it fits... Rhino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 3 4 Next Page 3 of 4 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
mjosparky 4 #69 October 6, 2004 QuoteAlso, the use of Type - 13 webbing in the harness, is more adaptable to the hardware. Almost all of the hardware used today was designed for use on Type XIII webbing before there was sports gear. SparkyMy idea of a fair fight is clubbing baby seals Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #70 October 6, 2004 Thanks, Sparky! Someone told me and I 'think', it was John Sherman, that, the old cotton webbing on very early harness, the weave of Type - 13 is more like that. The hardware used today dates back to then. The Type - 8 webbing sewn as a 'back-up' to Type - 7 webbing was to 'help' avoid 'slippage' of the hardware due to it's 'softer' weave. Seems to me, since the weave of the Type - 13 works better with the hardware, why doesn't 'everyone' use it? Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teason 0 #71 October 6, 2004 It was probably John, we had the same conversation. The hardware was designed for cotton webbing. Interesting side note, when cotton webbing was replaced, the navy and the airforce didn't join forces! While the airforce had type XIII, type XXVII was made for the navy. It has similar strength, similar weave and black tracers down the side. Type VII was designed for use with cargo. Also, some canadian manufacturers use type XIII webbing. Al Macdonald uses it in his sidewinders and the late Steve West used it in his Innovater container. Just useless trivia.I would rather be a superb meteor, every atom of me in magnificent glow, than a sleepy and permanent planet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #72 October 6, 2004 No, Not 'useless trivia'. Interesting information... I learned something. Thanks for taking the time to write that. I have had the opportunity to visit with Mr. and Mrs. MacDonald. Really nice folks who put-out a really good harness-container. Anyhow, thanks again. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zaidush 0 #73 October 6, 2004 I will never buy a second Racer. NOT because bad performance or comfortable or rigging issues or AAD issues or pop top or service or reliability - I will NOT buy one ever again because at the second you get it out of the pack- you are loosing at list 60% of what you paid. Doesn't meter why it got thr bad reputation - the bottom line is - you get a poor market of buyers and a very bad deal when you want to sell it. I'm still trying to get rid of the one i have. its a 4 years old. good condition, evarage size for intermediate - I can't get more then 150$. if it was Javelin/Vector/Mirage - i could get at least 600$! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RMURRAY 1 #74 October 7, 2004 you get screwed selling any gear (that you bought new) - but especially the "non-2k3" racers. they are not popular in many places. I think when you buy new, you should be thinking I am keeping this for a long long time --- unless you have cash to burn. by the way, I will only ever jump a racer - but I would not buy another new one. rm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rhino 0 #75 October 7, 2004 I have a Shadow Racer, NOS, with the tuck tab mod... It is a fantastic rig... Personally I love the way it fits... Rhino Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites