0
jumpwally

Rage: The new canopy

Recommended Posts

I'm betting that's not the rage he's talking about.

Flight concepts has come out with a Hybrid (ZP top skin, low porosity bottom skin) canopy called the rage as well. Big ad in Skydiving not to long ago. I don't expect a whole lot from it.

The Rage you pointed to is an interesting idea, and I'd love to get my hands on one. I hear they open like a ton of bricks on methanphedimiens however.
----------------------------------------------
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The Rage you pointed to is an interesting idea, and I'd love to get my hands on one. I hear they open like a ton of bricks on methanphedimiens however.



I am not quite sure how the bricks on methanphedimiens would open but I do know how the R.A.G.E. opens. I have jumped the 97 and the 86 sqft model. I have only done about 6 jumps on each, but every opening was on heading and very slow. That is despite the hole in the slider :o
Dave

Fallschirmsport Marl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One of the more experienced skydivers at our DZ is a rep for Flight Concepts. We have probably half a dozen of the floating around at a time from sizes 110 to 170.. they are a very common canopy at our DZ, and pretty much anyone that has demoed one has bought it.

Steep Angle of attack
extremely slow openings provided it is packed correctly.. there is only 1 mistake I have seen in packing that resulted in hard openings

fully tapered

I personally have jumped the 120 and it was very similar to my stiletto, although I don't think it turned quite as fast, and the glide was noticably steeper, overall speed seemed a bit faster.

Blue Skies !

Bryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Steep Angle of attack



Are you sure it is AOA that is "steep", since the AOA is defined as the angle formed beteween the freestream velocity vector (relative wind) and the chord line.

Quote

and the glide was noticably steeper,



I think this means you were referring to the flight path angle above instead of the AOA. I see this mistake pretty often in the forums. Up to a point, a steeper (higher) AOA will result in a flatter glide (flight path) angle and slower speed. The AOA in static conditions is determined by the angle of incidence or trim angle. Think of how pulling on your front and rear risers affects the flight of the canopy. Pulling on the risers has the effect of changing the trim angle and AOA. Rear risers increase the angle of attack. How does that affect the canopy flight? Front risers decrease the AOA. How do they affect the flight of the canopy?
alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0