ManBird 0 #26 May 5, 2003 Here's a stow you could add to it. "¯"`-._.-¯) ManBird (¯-._.-´"¯" Click Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
motherhucker 0 #27 May 5, 2003 QuoteHere's a stow you could add to it. Have fun with it guys...count me out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ManBird 0 #28 May 5, 2003 QuoteQuoteHere's a stow you could add to it. Have fun with it guys...count me out.Hey, just theorizing. We've come up with the pros of this concept / device. Now I'd like to hear the cons. That is, reasons why this wouldn't work, as opposed to just, "My feet are coated... coated in chocolate." What?"¯"`-._.-¯) ManBird (¯-._.-´"¯" Click Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
motherhucker 0 #29 May 5, 2003 QuoteQuoteQuoteHere's a stow you could add to it. Have fun with it guys...count me out.Hey, just theorizing. We've come up with the pros of this concept / device. Now I'd like to hear the cons. That is, reasons why this wouldn't work, as opposed to just, "My feet are coated... coated in chocolate." What? Not quite following the chocolate thang, but I don't see what's wrong with break cord. When it comes to gear, I am a huge proponent of keeping it as simple as possible. Using break cord for a s/l jump falls into this category (I personally don't like s/l jumps at all). IMHO, the bridle itself, as one's sole means of survival from launch to extraction, should be as clean, strong and simple as possible. Just the thought of pin bartacks or shrivel flap connections breaking while the rig is packed sends a cold shiver up the spine...having what looks like a much more complex system attached to the bridle [such as the ones drawn] increases the likleyhood of failure. It seems to me that the more holes a needle puts in my bridle, the weaker my bridle will be, ultimately. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Again, I don't even like s/l jumps, but that's just me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
